Morse theory for group presentations
& the persistent fundamental group

XIMENA FERNANDEZ

Durham University

EPSRC CENTRE FOR TOPOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS

British Topology Meeting 2022



'Every mathematician has a secret weapon.
Mine is Morse theory.'

Raoul Bott.

Discrete Morse Theory



Discrete Morse Theory

Goal: 'Simplify' the cell decomposition of a CW-complex while preserving its homotopy type.

  • $K$ a regular CW-complex.

Discrete Morse Theory

Goal: 'Simplify' the cell decomposition of a CW-complex while preserving its homotopy type.

  • $K$ a regular CW-complex.
  • $f:K\to \mathbb{R}$ a discrete Morse function.
  • For every cell $e^n$ in $K$, $\#\{e^n\succ e^{n-1}: f(e^n)\leq f(e^{n-1})\}\leq 1 \text{ and } \#\{e^n\prec e^{n+1} : f(e^n)\geq f(e^{n+1})\}\leq 1.$

Discrete Morse Theory

Goal: 'Simplify' the cell decomposition of a CW-complex while preserving its homotopy type.

  • $K$ a regular CW-complex.
  • $f:K\to \mathbb{R}$ a discrete Morse function.
  • $C$ the set of critical cells of $K$.
  • An $n$-cell $e^n \in K$ is a critical cell of index $n$ if the values of $f$ in every face and coface of $e^n$ increase with dimension.

Discrete Morse Theory

Goal: 'Simplify' the cell decomposition of a CW-complex while preserving its homotopy type.

  • $K$ a regular CW-complex.
  • $f:K\to \mathbb{R}$ a discrete Morse function.
  • $C$ the set of critical cells of $K$.

Theorem [Forman, '95]. $K$ is homotopy equivalent to a CW-complex $K_\mathcal{M}$ with exactly one cell of dimension $k$ for every critical cell of index $k$.

Discrete Morse Theory

Goal: 'Simplify' the cell decomposition of a CW-complex while preserving its homotopy type.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Lemma (Internal collapse): Let $K$ be a CW-complex of dimension $\leq n$. Let $\varphi:\partial D^n\to K$ be the attaching map of an $n$-cell $e^n$. If $K \searrow L$, then \[K\cup e^n \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}}L\cup \widetilde{e}^n\] where the attaching map $\widetilde{\varphi}\colon \partial D^ n\to L$ of $\widetilde{e}^n$ is defined as $\widetilde{\varphi}=r \varphi$ with $r:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract induced by the collapse $K \searrow L$.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Proposition: Let $ \displaystyle K \cup \bigcup_{i=1}^d e_i$ be a CW-complex where $\dim (K) \leq \dim (e_{i})\leq \dim (e_{i+1})\leq n$ for all $i=1, 2, \dots, d$. Let $\displaystyle \varphi_j:\partial D_j\to K\cup \bigcup_{i < j} e_i$ be the attaching map of $e_j$. If $K\searrow L$, then there exist CW-complexes $Z_1\leq Z_2\leq \dots \leq Z_d$ of dim $\leq n+1$ such that for every $j=1, 2, \dots, d,$ \[K\cup \bigcup_{i=1}^j e_i \nearrow Z_j \searrow L\cup \bigcup_{i=1}^j \widetilde e_i\] where the attaching map $\displaystyle \widetilde \varphi_j:\partial D_j\to L\cup \bigcup_{i< j} \widetilde e_i$ of the cell $\widetilde e_j$ is defined inductively as:
$\bullet ~~\displaystyle \widetilde \varphi_1=r_0\varphi_1$ with $r_0:K\to L$ the canonical strong deformation retract and for $j>1$, $\bullet ~~\widetilde \varphi_{j}=\widetilde r_{j-1}\imath_{j-1}\varphi_{j}$ where $ \widetilde r_{j-1}:Z_{j-1}\to L\cup \bigcup_{i< j} \widetilde e_i$ is the strong deformation retract and $\imath_{j-1}: K\cup \bigcup_{i< j} e_i \to Z_{j-1}$ is the inclusion.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Theorem [F. 2021]: Let $K$ be a regular CW-complex of dim $n$ and let $f:K\to \mathbb{R}$ be discrete Morse function. Then, $f$ induces a sequence of internal collapses given by a filtration of $K$ \[ \varnothing = K_{-1} \subseteq L_0 \subseteq K_0\subseteq L_1\subseteq K_1 \dots \subseteq L_{N}\subseteq K_{N}=K\] such that $K_j\searrow L_{j}$ for all $1\leq j\leq N$ and $\displaystyle L_{j}=K_{j-1}\cup \bigcup_{i=1}^{d_j} e_i^j$ with $\{e_i^j:0\leq j\leq N, 1\leq i \leq d_j\}$ the set of critical cells of $f$. Moreover, \[ K \nearrow\hspace{-1.5 pt} \searrow\hspace{-8pt}^{^{n+1}} L_0\cup \bigcup_{j=1}^{N} \bigcup_{i=1}^{d_j}\widetilde e_i^j = K_\mathcal{M}.\]

* Here, the attaching maps of the cells $\widetilde e_i^j$ can be explicitly reconstructed from the internal collapses.

Discrete Morse Theory & Whitehead deformations

Morse theory for group presentations



$\bullet$ X. Fernandez, Morse theory for group presentations (2021) arXiv:1912.00115

CW-complexes of dim 2

$\leftrightarrow$

Group presentations

CW-complexes of dim 2

$K_{\mathcal{P}}$

$\leftrightarrow$

Group presentations

$\mathcal{P}= \langle x,y ~|~xyx^{-1}y^{-1}\rangle $

CW-complexes of dim 2

$K$

$\leftrightarrow$

Group presentations

$\mathcal{P}_K = \langle x_4, x_6, x_7, x_8, x_9, x_{10}, x_{11}, x_{12}, x_{13}~ | \\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x_{13}, x_{13}^{-1}x_{12}x_4^{-1},x_{12}^{-1}x_{11}, x_{11}^{-1}x_{10}x_6^{-1}, \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x_{10}^{-1}x_9x_4, x_9^{-1}x_8, x_8^{-1}x_7x_6, x_7^{-1}\rangle $

Morse theory for group presentations

$K$

$\mathcal{P}_K = \langle x_4, x_6, x_7, x_8, x_9, x_{10}, x_{11}, x_{12}, x_{13}~ | \\~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x_{13}, x_{13}^{-1}x_{12}x_4^{-1},x_{12}^{-1}x_{11}, x_{11}^{-1}x_{10}x_6^{-1}, \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x_{10}^{-1}x_9x_4, x_9^{-1}x_8, x_8^{-1}x_7x_6, x_7^{-1}\rangle $

$K + f\colon K\to \mathbb{R}$ Morse function

$\mathcal{P}_{K_{\mathcal{M}}} = \langle x_4, x_6~ | ~ x_6x_4x_6^{-1}x_4^{-1}\rangle $

Morse theory for group presentations


Given $K$ a regular CW-complex of dim 2 and $f\colon K\to \mathbb{R}$ a discrete Morse function with a single critical 0-cell, we developed an algorithmic description of the Morse presentation $\mathcal{P}_{K_{\mathcal M}}$.

$O(M^2)$ with $M$ = |2-cells of $K$|

ximenafernandez/Finite-Topological-Spaces (SAGE)

Morse theory for group presentations

Given $K$ a regular CW-complex and $f\colon K\to \mathbb{R}$ a discrete Morse function with a single critical 0-cell, we developed an algorithmic description of the Morse presentation $\mathcal{P}_{K_{\mathcal M}}$.

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture



$\bullet$ X. Fernandez, Morse theory for group presentations (2021) arXiv:1912.00115

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture

Conjecture [Andrews & Curtis, 1965]. Any finite balanced presentation $\mathcal{P}=\langle x_1,\dots,x_n ~|~ r_1,\dots,r_n\rangle $ of the trivial group can be transformed into the empty presentation $\langle ~|~\rangle$ by a finite sequence of the following operations:

  1. replace some relator $r_i$ by $r_i^{-1}$
  2. replace some relator $r_i$ by $r_i r_j$ for some $j \neq i$
  3. replace some relator $r_i$ by a conjugate $wr_i w^{-1}$ for some $w$ in the free group $F(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)$
  4. add a generator $x_{n+1}$ and a relator $r_{n+1}$ that coincides with $x_{n+1}$, or the inverse of this operation

Tietze transformations

Theorem [Tietze, 1908]. Any finite presentation $\mathcal{P}=\langle x_1,\dots,x_n ~|~ r_1,\dots,r_m\rangle $ of a group $G$ can be transformed into any other presentation of the same group by a finite sequence of the following operations:

  1. replace some relator $r_i$ by $r_i^{-1}$
  2. replace some relator $r_i$ by $r_i r_j$ for some $j \neq i$
  3. replace some relator $r_i$ by a conjugate $wr_i w^{-1}$ for some $w$ in the free group $F(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)$
  4. add a generator $x_{n+1}$ and a relator $r_{m+1}$ that coincides with $x_{n+1}$, or the inverse of this operation
  5. add a relator $1$, or the inverse of this operation

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture

Potential counterexamples.

  • $\mathcal{P}=\langle x, y~|~ xyx = yxy,~ x^n = y^{n+1}\rangle,~n\geq 2$ [Akbulut & Kirby, 1985]
  • $\mathcal{P} = \langle x,y~|~x^{-1}y^n x = y^{n+1}, ~x = y^{-1}xyx^{-1}\rangle,~n\geq 2$ [Miller & Schupp, 1999]
  • $\mathcal{P}=\langle x,y~| ~x=[x^m,y^n], y=[y^p,x^q]\rangle ,~n,m,p,q\in \mathbb{Z}$ [Gordon, 1984]

Theorem [Bridson, 2015] There exist balanced presentations on the trivial group that satifies the AC-conjecture for which the the minimun length of a simplification sequence is superexponential in the length of the relators.

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture

Remark [Referee]. AC-transformations of group presentations are in correspondence with 3-deformations of 2-complexes.

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture

Corollary [F. 2021]. Let $\mathcal{P}$ be a finite presentation of a finitely presented group. Let $K'_{\mathcal{P}}$ be the barycentric subdivision of the standard complex $K_{\mathcal{P}}$ and let $f:K'_{\mathcal{P}}\to \mathbb{R}$ be a discrete Morse function.
Then $\mathcal{P}\sim_{AC}\mathcal{P}_{(K'_{\mathcal{P}})_{\mathcal M}}$.

The Andrews-Curtis conjecture

Theorem [F. 2021]. The following balanced presentations of the trivial group satisfies the Andrews-Curtis conjecture:
$\bullet ~~\mathcal{P}=\langle x, y~|~ xyx = yxy,~ x^2 = y^{3}\rangle$* [Akbulut & Kirby, 1985]
$\bullet ~~\mathcal{P}= \langle x,y~|~x^{-1}y^3 x = y^{4}, ~x = y^{-1}xyx^{-1}\rangle$ [Miller & Schupp, 1999]
$\bullet ~~\mathcal{P}=\langle x,y~| ~x=[x^{-1},y^{-1}], y=[y^{-1},x^q]\rangle, \forall q \in \mathbb{N}$ [Gordon, 1984]


* First proved by Miasnikov in 2003 using genetic algorithms.

The Persistent fundamental group



$\bullet$ Joint work (in progress) with Kevin Piterman (2022).

Topological inference

Let $X_n$ be a (possible noisy) finite sample of an unknown topological space $\mathcal X$.

Topological inference

Let $X_n$ be a (possible noisy) finite sample of an unknown topological space $\mathcal X$.

Goal: Describe an algorithmic tool to infer the fundamental group of $\mathcal{X}$ from $X_n$.

Persistence

  • Metric space $(X_n,d)$

Persistence

  • Metric space $(X_n,d)$
  • Filtration (connected)\[K_1 \xrightarrow{i_1} K_2 \xrightarrow{i_2} \dots \xrightarrow{i_{N-1}} K_N\]

Persistence

  • Metric space $(X_n,d)$
  • Filtration (connected)\[K_1 \xrightarrow{i_1} K_2 \xrightarrow{i_2} \dots \xrightarrow{i_{N-1}} K_N\]
  • Persistent fundamental group \[\pi_1(K_1) \xrightarrow{(i_1)_*} \pi_1(K_2) \xrightarrow{(i_2)_*} \dots \xrightarrow{(i_{N-1})_*} \pi_1(K_N)\]

Persistence

  • Metric space $(X_n,d)$
  • Filtration (connected)\[K_1 \xrightarrow{i_1} K_2 \xrightarrow{i_2} \dots \xrightarrow{i_{N-1}} K_N\]
  • Persistent fundamental group \[\pi_1(K_1) \xrightarrow{(i_1)_*} \pi_1(K_2) \xrightarrow{(i_2)_*} \dots \xrightarrow{(i_{N-1})_*} \pi_1(K_N)\]

Morse reduction. Given $f\colon K_N\to \mathbb{R}$ Morse function, \[(K_1)_\mathcal{M} \xrightarrow{?} (K_2)_\mathcal{M} \xrightarrow{?} \dots \xrightarrow{?} (K_N)_\mathcal{M}\]
\[\pi_1((K_1)_\mathcal{M})\xrightarrow{?} \pi_1((K_2)_\mathcal{M}) \xrightarrow{?} \dots \xrightarrow{?}\pi_1((K_N)_\mathcal{M})\]

Persistence

  • Metric space $(X_n,d)$
  • Filtration (connected) \[K_1 \xrightarrow{i_1} K_2 \xrightarrow{i_2} \dots \xrightarrow{i_{N-1}} K_N\]
  • $f\colon K_N\to \mathbb{R}$ Morse function

  • Persistent fundamental group
    There exist $\varphi_i: \pi_1((K_i)_\mathcal{M})\to\pi_1((K_{i+1})_\mathcal{M})$ such that \[\pi_1(K_1) \xrightarrow{(i_1)_*} \pi_1(K_2) \xrightarrow{(i_2)_*} \dots \xrightarrow{(i_{N-1})_*} \pi_1(K_N)\] \[\cong ~~~~~~\circlearrowleft~~~~~~\cong ~~~~~~\circlearrowleft~~~~~~~~~~\circlearrowleft~~~~~\cong \] \[\pi_1((K_1)_\mathcal{M})\xrightarrow{\varphi_1} \pi_1((K_2)_\mathcal{M}) \xrightarrow{\varphi_2} \dots \xrightarrow{\varphi_{N-1}}\pi_1((K_N)_\mathcal{M})\]

Persistent fundamental group

  • Algorithm with runtime $O(M^2)$ where $M$ = |2-cells of $K_N$|
  • Example

    $S^2\vee S^1\vee S^1$ vs $S^1\times S^1$

    Example

    $S^2\vee S^1\vee S^1$ vs $S^1\times S^1$

    Vietoris–Rips filtration $\mathrm{VR}_{\alpha}(X_n)$


    For $\alpha \in [1, \sqrt{2})$ and $\alpha' \in [\sqrt{2}, 2)$, \[\varphi_{\alpha, \alpha'}(x_i) = \begin{cases} x_{16} & \text{if }i = 13,14,15,16\\ x_{17} & \text{if }i = 4,8,12,17\\ 1 & \text{otherwise}.\end{cases} \]

    Example

    $S^2\vee S^1\vee S^1$ vs $S^1\times S^1$

    Persistent fundamental group $\mathrm{P}\Pi_1(X_n)$

    Persistent homology $\mathrm{P H}_{*}(X_n)$

    Thanks!